<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Republicans vs Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cursoandino.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cursoandino.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Democratic party platform issues&#8230; why don&#8217;t the Democrats seem to really want to keep their promises? by ObamaBot THX-1138</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/the-democratic-party-platform-issues-why-dont-the-democrats-seem-to-really-want-to-keep-their-promises/#comment-7008</link>
		<dc:creator>ObamaBot THX-1138</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/the-democratic-party-platform-issues-why-dont-the-democrats-seem-to-really-want-to-keep-their-promises/#comment-7008</guid>
		<description>There are a few Democrats in the Senate that blocked most of Obama&#039;s and the platform. It&#039;s too bad. Why do they call themselves Democrats if they vote against single payer?

But the corporate interests are simply too great to refuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few Democrats in the Senate that blocked most of Obama&#8217;s and the platform. It&#8217;s too bad. Why do they call themselves Democrats if they vote against single payer?</p>
<p>But the corporate interests are simply too great to refuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Democratic party platform issues&#8230; why don&#8217;t the Democrats seem to really want to keep their promises? by Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/the-democratic-party-platform-issues-why-dont-the-democrats-seem-to-really-want-to-keep-their-promises/#comment-7007</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/the-democratic-party-platform-issues-why-dont-the-democrats-seem-to-really-want-to-keep-their-promises/#comment-7007</guid>
		<description>Democrats are the biggest liars. Remember their promise about the most open and ethical Congress in history?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats are the biggest liars. Remember their promise about the most open and ethical Congress in history?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Democratic party platform issues&#8230; why don&#8217;t the Democrats seem to really want to keep their promises? by Titianna</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/the-democratic-party-platform-issues-why-dont-the-democrats-seem-to-really-want-to-keep-their-promises/#comment-7006</link>
		<dc:creator>Titianna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/the-democratic-party-platform-issues-why-dont-the-democrats-seem-to-really-want-to-keep-their-promises/#comment-7006</guid>
		<description>They do and they are.

Next.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do and they are.</p>
<p>Next&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libs, knowing the following is true, and Hillary possibly having involvement, will you still vote for her? by rmagedon</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6995</link>
		<dc:creator>rmagedon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6995</guid>
		<description>That is what I would term a lot of smoke, in that were there is smoke there is usually fire.

However there are much more provable things that would make anyone who is not brainwashed vote against this person, and I use the term person loosely in her case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is what I would term a lot of smoke, in that were there is smoke there is usually fire.</p>
<p>However there are much more provable things that would make anyone who is not brainwashed vote against this person, and I use the term person loosely in her case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libs, knowing the following is true, and Hillary possibly having involvement, will you still vote for her? by thrillhaus</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6994</link>
		<dc:creator>thrillhaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6994</guid>
		<description>Let me see if I understand your premise correctly:

Clinton couldn&#039;t get a blow job from someone who wasn&#039;t his wife without having millions of dollars wasted investigating it, but he apparently had dozens of people offed and not a single reputable media outlet or prosecuter sees fit to investigate?  Yeah, that seems pretty likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me see if I understand your premise correctly:</p>
<p>Clinton couldn&#8217;t get a blow job from someone who wasn&#8217;t his wife without having millions of dollars wasted investigating it, but he apparently had dozens of people offed and not a single reputable media outlet or prosecuter sees fit to investigate?  Yeah, that seems pretty likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libs, knowing the following is true, and Hillary possibly having involvement, will you still vote for her? by Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6993</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6993</guid>
		<description>Now you know why Bill Clinton had Janet Reno fire &quot;all&quot; 93 U.S. Attorneys as one of his first acts as President !! So he could replace them with attorneys that were under his control , so none of these murders of people that had information  &amp; knowledge of Clinton`s lawlessness could be investigated to the fullist  extent of the law !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you know why Bill Clinton had Janet Reno fire &#8220;all&#8221; 93 U.S. Attorneys as one of his first acts as President !! So he could replace them with attorneys that were under his control , so none of these murders of people that had information  &#038; knowledge of Clinton`s lawlessness could be investigated to the fullist  extent of the law !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libs, knowing the following is true, and Hillary possibly having involvement, will you still vote for her? by DON'T BURN ME</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6992</link>
		<dc:creator>DON'T BURN ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6992</guid>
		<description>Only drug addicted retarded losers will vote for Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only drug addicted retarded losers will vote for Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libs, knowing the following is true, and Hillary possibly having involvement, will you still vote for her? by Noah H</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6991</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6991</guid>
		<description>Non-sense.  A good number of the people mentioned never actually existed.  Propaganda is a wonderful thing..all you have to do is &#039;suggest&#039; that Bill Clinton and/or Hillary Clinton somehow managed to put out contracts on several dozen people and suddenly it becomes the &#039;truth&#039;.  It&#039;s not, but that&#039;s not the point.  The point, because the reactionaries of the current GOP really can&#039;t justify any of their goofy policies or even their politics,must resort to &#039;character assassination&#039;.  Now if you could produce real proof even on one single assassination, then you&#039;d have a case.  You guys have to come to grips that this kind of BS cuts both ways...make this kind of politics standard operating proceedure and the entire system grinds to a halt....and for what?  Who would actually gain?  In the end, nobody and everyone will lose.  Also, should you be of the &#039;christian&#039; persuasion, &#039;bearing false witness&#039; is a sin......worse, you could get sued for slander.  If it&#039;s the &#039;truth&#039;, tell it like it is...if it&#039;s not....don&#039;t do it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-sense.  A good number of the people mentioned never actually existed.  Propaganda is a wonderful thing..all you have to do is &#8216;suggest&#8217; that Bill Clinton and/or Hillary Clinton somehow managed to put out contracts on several dozen people and suddenly it becomes the &#8216;truth&#8217;.  It&#8217;s not, but that&#8217;s not the point.  The point, because the reactionaries of the current GOP really can&#8217;t justify any of their goofy policies or even their politics,must resort to &#8216;character assassination&#8217;.  Now if you could produce real proof even on one single assassination, then you&#8217;d have a case.  You guys have to come to grips that this kind of BS cuts both ways&#8230;make this kind of politics standard operating proceedure and the entire system grinds to a halt&#8230;.and for what?  Who would actually gain?  In the end, nobody and everyone will lose.  Also, should you be of the &#8216;christian&#8217; persuasion, &#8216;bearing false witness&#8217; is a sin&#8230;&#8230;worse, you could get sued for slander.  If it&#8217;s the &#8216;truth&#8217;, tell it like it is&#8230;if it&#8217;s not&#8230;.don&#8217;t do it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libs, knowing the following is true, and Hillary possibly having involvement, will you still vote for her? by John S</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6990</link>
		<dc:creator>John S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6990</guid>
		<description>When you add to that list the people and their crimes that Bill has given pardons to it almost seems they have surpassed shrubs arranged murders performed on 9/11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you add to that list the people and their crimes that Bill has given pardons to it almost seems they have surpassed shrubs arranged murders performed on 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libs, knowing the following is true, and Hillary possibly having involvement, will you still vote for her? by nolajazzyguide</title>
		<link>http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6989</link>
		<dc:creator>nolajazzyguide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cursoandino.org/libs-knowing-the-following-is-true-and-hillary-possibly-having-involvement-will-you-still-vote-for-her/#comment-6989</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton will NOT be around to try to take the 2008 election, trust me.   She will be prosecuted for TREASON and a host of other crimes.  The Clintons, Bushies, Rummy, RIce, and Gonzales, along with most of the presidential candidates will ALL be prosecuted.  Plus a lot of others.  The Big Changes are a-coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton will NOT be around to try to take the 2008 election, trust me.   She will be prosecuted for TREASON and a host of other crimes.  The Clintons, Bushies, Rummy, RIce, and Gonzales, along with most of the presidential candidates will ALL be prosecuted.  Plus a lot of others.  The Big Changes are a-coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

